R. v. Patrick Fox - Corruption, Collusion and Perjury in the BC Justice System

R. v. Patrick Fox - Criminal Harassment

The Narrative
Court Proceedings (transcripts, recordings)
RCMP Reports to Crown Counsel (RTCC)
RCMP Interviews
Emails Between US CBP, US ICE, CBSA and RCMP
Other Shit
Relevant Parties

Let's talk about the stuff the news refused to tell you about.

Let me start by saying: Fuck the Canadian justice system! Fuck the BC Crown Counsel! Fuck corrupt defense attorneys who collude with prosecutors to suppress critical evidence! Fuck feminists who blindly insist on supporting evil, sociopathic women for no reason other than that they are women! And fuck all those who would rather put an innocent man in jail than to realize that there are, actually, evil people in the world who just happen to be female.

Okay, now that we got that out of the way, let's talk about the rest of the story - the stuff the Canadian news media refused to tell you about.

Regina v. Patrick Fox is the criminal harassment case Desiree filed against her ex-husband, Patrick Fox, for creating this website. The entire case was a sham right from the beginning.

The First Arrest - Charges Dropped

The RCMP first arrested and charged Patrick with criminal harassment in July 2015. The Crown then dropped all the charges and decided not to prosecute. Because they knew Desiree was full of shit and was lying? Perhaps.

As a result of that first criminal harassment charge, the RCMP placed Patrick's firearms license in a restricted state while they investigated to determine whether the license should be revoked. They investigated from October 2015 until March 2016 - 5 months. And ultimately they decided there was absolutely no basis to revoke Patrick's firearms license. That should tell you something! In Canada there is no right to bear arms - a firearms license and firearms possession is a privilege. The fact that the RCMP determined there was no basis to cancel Patrick's license is pretty clear proof that they did not believe Desiree's claims and did not think that Patrick was a danger to anyone.

Desiree Cries to the News Media

Then in January 2016, Desiree goes fake-crying to that feminist journalist Natalie Clancy. She does a series of completely misrepresented stories about this website ( B.C. man Patrick Fox aims to 'destroy' ex-wife with revenge website, B.C. revenge website sets off torrent of anger, legal concerns, Cyberbullying creating difficult questions for legal system, CBC News TV segment ), essentially entirely from Desiree's perspective, using a few out of context quotes from Patrick and suddenly all the disgusting, irrational, misguided militant feminists and the pussy men they dominate start screaming about how this shouldn't be legal. Of course, it is legal, so the RCMP and the Crown still do nothing about it.

Publishing a website and going on the news are the same thing!

Patrick loses his job at Vtech due to the CBC story (Letter of Termination, Vtech). And while the news media and the Crown have made a big deal about Desiree possibly, maybe losing her job due to this website, there has never been a single mention of the fact that Patrick absolutely, unquestionably lost his job as a result of Desiree going on the news media. And just how is Desiree going on the news ANY different from Patrick putting up a website? It is the exact same thing - just a different medium - yet Patrick goes to jail for 2 and a half years and Desiree gets people's pity and compassion. You people are so fucked up!

Patrick Goes Back to the US

Then, in May 2016, Patrick decides to move back to Los Angeles - to hell with Canada and all their raging feminazi nonsense. US Border Patrol arrests him for illegal re-entry, making false statements to a federal agent, false claim of US citizenship, and a bunch of other crap. The bring him in; investigate; realize his statements and claims of being a US citizen are actually true; and they drop all the charges. They hand him over to ICE because in 2009 the US Immigration Court, in their overwhelming incompetence (or corruption), decided Patrick was an illegal alien and ordered him removed from the US.

ICE knew they would not be able to get yet another travel document from the Canadian government, to deport Patrick to Canada again, so they tried to get the RCMP to request Patrick be sent back to Canada so the RCMP could "interview" him about where his Canadian firearms were (Patrick had already brought them to LA on a previous trip). The RCMP had no interest in that so they asked ICE to interview Patrick about it - being that Patrick was already being detained by ICE anyway. So ICE decides, fuck it, let's just take him to the border and hope that the RCMP will take him in as a "person of interest". ICE makes up a bunch of outrageous claims to the RCMP, that Patrick was trying to sneak into the US to go and kill (literally) Desiree.

Desiree informs good ol' Natalie Clancy that Patrick was arrested and is in ICE custody. Clancy throws a fit with the RCMP, screaming that she's going to do a story about how they fucked up by not prosecuting Patrick and now he's going down to Arizona to murder that poor, helpless woman. The RCMP and the Crown don't want that bad press, after all the bullshit in the news about this a few months prior, so they start trying to find something to charge Patrick with. They figure the Crown can offer him bail conditions that will require him to take down the website and not leave BC. Except that Patrick goes and tells the Crown to shove their conditions up their asses.

David Hopkins Colludes with Crown to Get Patrick Denied Bail

So the Crown charges Patrick with unlawful exportation of firearms knowing it to be unlawful (CCC section 103), in addition to the criminal harassment (CCC section 264), and to possessing his firearms in a place not authorized (by his ATT) (CCC section 93). With that unlawful exportation charge, bail is automatically denied (CCC section 515((6)(a)(vi)). However, no authorization is required to export your firearms to the US - Patrick looked into that before bringing his guns down here, so that he wouldn't break the law. The waste of skin lawyer (David Hopkins) that Patrick had at the bail hearing refused to bring that up. It even clearly states that no authorization is required right on the RCMP's own website! Hopkins, that jackass, refused to even check that on the RCMP's website! Fucking useless prick.

It quickly became clear that David Hopkins was assisting the Crown to ensure Patrick would be denied bail. We can't say it might have been incompetence because he adamantly refused to go to the RCMP's website and see that it clearly states absolutely no authorization was required for Patrick to export his four handguns and one rifle to the US, until days after the bail hearing.

So Patrick decided this was just like that damned Arizona forgery case all over again. He fired that useless bastard, Hopkins, and decided to represent himself - again.

Patrick informed that tool of a prosecutor, Mark Myhre, that no authorization is required to export his firearms to the US. He showed Myhre the page from the RCMP's website. Five weeks later the Crown dropped the unlawful exportation charge.

At the second bail hearing, the Crown argued that if Patrick is released he will continue to update the website, thereby continuing to subject Desiree to ongoing harassment. Patrick argued that yes, of course, he will continue to update the website - it's called free speech! If the bitch doesn't like it; if it hurts her feelings, she simply doesn't have to go to the website! (We're paraphrasing, of course.)

Preliminary Inquiry - Clinton Bauman Colludes with Crown to Suppress Evidence

Then, for the preliminary inquiry, Patrick hired another lawyer - Clinton Bauman. And can you guess what Bauman did? Patrick insisted Bauman challenge the firearms (section 93) charge because there was absolutely no evidence the firearms were ever at the location the Crown was claiming (The Packaging Depot). But you know what the fucker did? Right at the beginning of the hearing the dumb fuck stands up and tells the court they don't challenge the firearms charge. What the fuck?!?! And then, Myhre requests to use a video recording of a statement by Capuano rather than having her testify. The court grants it. So there will be no way to cross examine her at the prelim. And do you think that dumb-ass Bauman played the recording of the other interview Desiree did with the RCMP where she's laughing and joking - you know, to show the court that she's full of shit? No! Not a fucking word about that recording!

So, again, it seemed very clear to Patrick that yet another lawyer was more focused on helping the Crown suppress embarrassing evidence than on defending him. Patrick fired Bauman and, again, represented himself.

Mark Myhre Refuses to Give Patrick the Recording of the RCMP Interview Where Desiree Laughs and Jokes

Throughout all of this, Myhre adamantly refused to provide Patrick a copy of the recording of Desiree's July 2016 RCMP interview where she's laughing and joking. Myhre knew that if that recording ever got out it would prove to every single person on the planet (aside from those militant feminists who are always going to stick up for Desiree no matter how much proof there is that she lied) that the RCMP and the Crown knew she was lying and that Patrick was innocent. Unfortunately for Myhre, Patrick had already obtained a copy from other sources and it's now right here on this website .

The 486.3 Hearing

Skip ahead to spring of 2017, Patrick is still in jail, representing himself. The Crown requests appointment of a lawyer to do the cross examination of Desiree rather than Patrick cross examining her himself. There's a ridiculously terrible statute in the Canadian Criminal Code (section 486.3(2)) which requires that if a witness or the Crown requests it then the court must order that such a lawyer be appointed. I say it's a terrible law because it makes it so easy for sociopaths like Desiree and Myhre to abuse and to deny a defendant a fair trial. At the 486.3 hearing, Patrick argues that his experience, so far, has been that the lawyers he has worked with have been more interested in helping the Crown suppress evidence that would either make the Crown and/or RCMP look bad or prove that they know Capuano is lying, and he believes any appointed attorney is going to do the same thing at the trial. Patrick cited specific examples of such. The judge, Heather Holmes, said she is sure Patrick believes that but that she doesn't see any evidence of it. She grants the 486.3 appointment - essentially ensuring that only the issues the Crown wants brought up on cross examination will be put before the jury.

Myhre told Patrick if he just takes the website down then the case would "go away".

In one of Patrick's meetings with Myhre, Patrick had pointed out that if a lawyer is appointed under 486.3, that will pretty much give control of the defense to the Crown because Capuano's testimony is, like, 90% of the case. Myhre smiled and said "Yeah, that's right."

Patrick then set out to try to find a credible attorney to do the cross examination. No credible lawyer would come anywhere near his case. That seemed strange, given the media attention the case had been getting. I mean, free publicity and all that shit, right? Eventually, Patrick was put in touch with Tony Lagemaat. Lagemaat seemed very interested in taking the appointment. Great!

Tony Lagemaat Takes the Case

Leading up to the trial, Lagemaat said all the right things: "There's nothing illegal about the website"; "If Capuano doesn't like it she could simply not go to it - that doesn't amount to harassment"; "This case is bullshit, there's no crime being committed here"; "The Crown is only prosecuting it because of the news coverage"; "It's obvious Desiree is lying - we're going to confront her with that proof"; et cetera, et cetera.

Patrick provided Lagemaat a copy of the recording of Capuano's July 2016 RCMP interview. Lagemaat agreed that that clearly proves she's full of shit and that she's not in the slightest bit harmed or harassed by anything that Patrick has done. He said it is critical that that recording me played for the jury.

Lagemaat Sabotages the Trial, Refuses to Present Critical Evidence

Then, the trial began. Lagemaat made no reference to the recording of the July 2016 RCMP interview. Capuano lied extensively on the stand. Patrick and Lagemaat had the proof that she was lying. Lagemaat refused to cross examine her on those lies, or to confront her with the proof she was lying.

At the end of Lagemaat's cross examination, Patrick told Lagemaat that he knew Lagemaat was avoiding the July 2016 RCMP interview because it would make the Myhre and the RCMP look bad and he didn't want to make his "associates" look bad. Lagemaat denied it, saying he would never sabotage a defense to save the Crown.

Patrick Raises the Recording of Desiree Laughing with the RCMP, Myhre Throws Lagemaat Under the Bus

Patrick then addressed the court, bringing up the recording of the RCMP interview and saying he believed it was critical for the jury to hear Desiree laughing about the same issues she was pretending to cry about on the witness stand. There was some back and forth. The court questioned Lagemaat on why he did not think that would be relevant. Lagemaat insisted he ran the cross examination the same way he would have if he was representing Patrick (which doesn't actually address the court's inquiry). Even Myhre conceded that parts of the recording would certainly be relevant - way to throw your stooge under the bus, Myhre (I think Myhre is going to have a hard time getting defense lawyers to collude with him after they read this). The court decided that parts of the recording should be played for the jury.

While Patrick was conferring with Lagemaat about which parts of the recording to play, he insisted the jury must hear Desiree laughing about punching herself in the stomach to try to force a miscarriage of their son {G*****}. Lagemaat repeatedly tried to talk him out of it, but Patrick was steadfast - what kind of monster could ever laugh or joke about something like that?

Segments of the RCMP interview were played for the jury. Desiree's response to them was that the laughter was a coping mechanism; that she laughed in order to prevent herself from crying. It was bullshit! That recording is on this website - listen to it for yourself.

The Jury Realizes Desiree is a Monster, Finds Patrick Guilty Anyway

After hearing Desiree's laughter, not one of the jury members held any compassion or pity for her. They knew it was not a coping mechanism. They saw, at that point, that she really was the monster this website is trying to show everybody that she is.

Nevertheless, on the second day of deliberations, the jury, very reluctantly, came back with a guilty verdict on both counts. I have never seen a jury foreman so uncomfortable about announcing a guilty verdict - his hands were visibly shaking from across the courtroom.

Myhre Pushes for a Psych Assessment of Patrick

Myhre immediately requested a psych assessment for Patrick, claiming there was reason to believe Patrick was delusional and possibly suffered from mental disorders. The judge didn't buy it. Regardless, a psych assessment was ordered as part of the probation (a copy of the recording of that assessment is on this website).

The reason Myhre wanted the psych assessment was that he figured he could get a diagnosis that Patrick suffered from some mental disorder and the Ministry of Justice could use that to discredit Patrick before he published any of the evidence that is now on this website. But, obviously that plan backfired because the psychiatrist determined that Patrick is the most sane, rational, and stable person who ever existed (again, we're paraphrasing). The audio recording of the psych assessment is on this website. Listen to it and decide for yourself who the delusional sociopath is - Patrick or Myhre!

Sentencing Bullshit

Over the next few months there were numerous sentencing hearings. Patrick submitted, literally, stacks and stacks of evidence of Desiree threatening him, taking steps to harass him and complicate his life, of her perjurious testimony, of the Crown and Lagemaat knowing she was committing perjury, and on and on. The Crown was asking for 3 years and 10 months in prison, followed by 3 years (the max) of probation. In November, at the sentencing, the Justice Holmes made absolutely no reference to any of the evidence Patrick submitted and, instead, made it seem that Desiree had never done a single bad thing and that Patrick had tormented and tortured her for years, for absolutely no reason. She sentenced him to exactly what the Crown was requesting!

Patrick's probation conditions :

Prohibit him from leaving British Columbia - even though he's not a Canadian citizen, he has no status in Canada (he's an illegal alien), he's not authorized to work in Canada or to receive any government assistance. This came up before the sentencing, so the court knew about it. This condition guarantees Patrick will remain homeless, peniless and without medical care for 3 years. This means Patrick will not be able to proceed with his appeal because he has no way to pay for the $2,125 for the photocopies of the transcripts.
Prohibit him from publishing, distributing, or disseminating any information about Desiree, James Pendleton, or {S*****}. That's why we're publishing this instead of him. Interestingly, the probation does not prohibit Patrick from continuing to maintain this website, as long as he isn't the one that actually publishes it. Also, Patrick is not even allowed to talk about Desiree in the presence of other people - that would constitute distributing information. Oh, give me a fucking break! So, Desiree can continue to go on TV or the Internet and say whatever she wants about Patrick and he's not even allowed to defend himself against her false allegations? Fuck off!
Prohibit him from using the Internet except for employment (which he's not legally authorized to obtain in Canada) or for sending emails. Really? Again, we say "Fuck off!" Give me a fucking break! What did he do? Murder and eat children? No! He exposed the truth about an evil, sociopath who has spent her life lying to people and abusing their trust, their decency and their compassion.

Patrick's Psychiatric Assessment

Regarding the psych assessment, Myhre originally claimed he believed Patrick suffered from some mental disorder because of the claims he was making about Desiree on the website. When Myhre eventually realized he couldn't continue with that because all the claims were true, he then said he believed Patrick was delusional because he kept insisting he's not a Canadian citizen. Ha! What a fucking twit that Mark Myhre is!

So, Patrick participated in a psychiatric assessment at Forensic Psychiatric Services on West Broadway, in Vancouver. And wouldn't you know, we just happen to have a recording of that entire psych assessment! No, you say! Yes, my friends! Go ahead, give it a listen. The most interesting parts start around an hour and thirteen minutes in (you can use the slider control to skip to that if you wish).

Audio recording of Patrick's court ordered psychiatric assessment.

Here's a document from IRCC , clearly showing Patrick was born in the US and has no status in Canada.
And here's a document from the BC Ministry of Social Development , showing that they communicated with IRCC and that it was determined Patrick is not a Canadian citizen, has no status in Canada, and is not eligible to receive benefits.
And here's a recording of a phone call between Patrick and IRCC, where they clearly state he does not have "any official status in Canada" (at 4:53).

Audio recording of telephone call between Patrick and IRCC.
And here's a recording of a phone call between Patrick and CBSA, where they also state he has no status in Canada and is, essentially, a visa overstay (at 7:15).

Audio recording of telephone call between Patrick and CBSA.

So, we would ask, Mr. Myhre, given all this proof that Patrick is not a Canadian citizen why do you keep insisting "all the evidence you've seen proves he is a Canadian citizen"? It seems to us that YOU are the one that should go for a psych assessment.

So, as I've said: Fuck the Canadian justice system and fuck Canadian society! Open your fucking eyes, for Christ's sake - not all women are helpless victims - there are bad, evil people out there and some of them just happen to have a vagina.

Court Proceedings

Date	Type of Proceeding	Media	Comments
2017-03-29	Pre Trial Conference	PDF
2017-04-29	Pre Trial Conference	PDF	This is the 486.3 hearing - where the court ordered that a corrupt lawyer would be forced upon Patrick, to do the cross examination of Desiree at the trial so that Patrick would not be able to cross examine her himself. This pretty much predetermined the outcome of the trial. This way, the Crown could get the appointed lawyer to collude with him to not bring up certain issues, to not pursue certain lines of questioning, and most importantly, to not bring up anything that would make the Crown or the RCMP look bad or which would prove they did anything wrong or illegal. Sounds unbelievable, right? Well, read the transcripts of Desiree's cross examination or listen to the audio of it, THEN tell me how unbelievable it sounds.
2017-05-23	Pre Trial Conference	PDF
2017-06-12	Trial (Desiree's Testimony)	PDF PDF audio audio audio audio audio audio	Day one of Desiree's testimony. She is under direct examination by Crown Counsel, Mark Myhre. Notice how Myhre seems to be acting like Desiree's a poor, helpless child? "And how did that make you feel?" Oh shut the fuck up! She's a psycho bitch in her mid-thirties who doesn't care about a single thing but herself and her weed. Argh! Really, am I on crazy pills or something?
2017-06-13	Trial (Desiree's Testimony)	PDF PDF audio audio audio audio audio audio	Day two of Desiree's direct examination. More of that pussy, Myhre, going on about "Oh, boo hoo, you poor little thing. This big scary man hurt your feelings." Holy fuck!
2017-06-14	Trial (Desiree's Testimony)	PDF PDF audio audio	And here we start with Desiree's cross examination. If only defense counsel, Tony Lagemaat, would bother to point out to the jury all the emails where Desiree threatened, taunted, insulted, belittled, and demeaned Patrick prior to the creation of the website. If only he would have confronted her with the proof that she was lying half the time - I mean, the proof was right here on this website. Oh well, I guess you can only expect so much from a lawyer that is forced on you by the court and is making deals with the Crown to not being up anything that might make the Crown or the RCMP look bad.
2017-06-15	Trial (Desiree's Testimony)	PDF PDF audio audio audio audio audio	The second day of Desiree's cross examination. Finally, she begrudgingly admits that she was, in fact, a stripper and is a drug addict! Completely contradicting what she said in international news media! But don't think for a second that news media will ever admit THAT! This is also where Lagemaat refused to play the recording of Desiree laughing with the RCMP, so Patrick brought it up. Lagemaat insisted he did not think it would be relevant/appropriate, the court disagreed, the Crown admitted that it would probably be relevant...who's fucking side was Lagemaat on, for Christ's sake?
2017-06-16	Trial	PDF	Testimony of RCMP Constable Jason Potts. The guy that interrogated Patrick.
2017-06-19	Trial	PDF audio	Testimony of Manvir Mangat, owner of The Packaging Depot; ATF Agent Frank Sizuocco; and RCMP Constable Jean-Philipe Dupont. Mangat and Spizuocco testified well - essentially not really saying anything particularly helpful to the Crown's case. Based on their testimony there was absolutely no evidence Patrick's firearms were ever at The Packaging Depot so there was absolutely nothing to support the section 93 firearms charge. As for Dupont...what a useless puppet! How convenient that he remembers everything that the Crown asked about but couldn't remember about anything Patrick asked about. Fucking RCMP.
2017-06-20	Trial	PDF	This is just a bunch of nonsense - Myhre going on and on and on and on about the firearms regulations. My God, man, drink some coffee, get some inflection in your voice. I swear, listening to Myhre talk is like being on Prozac.
2017-06-21	Trial	PDF audio audio	Now this is interesting. On this day, Yvette Brend and Natalie Clancy, from CBC appeared and addressed the court. They were requesting access to, and electronic copies of the exhibits and some evidence. But as you can see from what they actually reported, they were only interested in the evidence that could make Patrick look bad. Objective journalism my ass! And it's very curious that Clancy already had a copy of the Crown's book. Just how the hell did she get that - unless Myhre gave it to her. Hmm! As the Sheriff was escorting Patrick back to the holding cells, he said "Wow, she [Clancy] really has it out for you." It's unfortunate Clancy left (fired?) CBC News shortly after Patrick's trial. We would have loved to have destroyed her career in journalism by exposing how full of shit she and Yvette Brend are.
2017-06-26	Trial	PDF	Here we have the closing arguments. Myhre going on for hours, in his usual monotone, about that poor Desiree who has been tormented and traumatized by that monster Patrick for so many years. Followed by Lagemaat again failing to bring up anything relevant about the years that Desiree (and her assortment of fiances) threatened Patrick with physical harm, false criminal charges, deportation, et cetera. Shocking! Fucking shocking!
2017-06-27	Trial (Charge to the Jury)	PDF
2017-06-28	Trial (Verdict)	PDF audio audio	And finally, we get to the verdict. The audio of this is interesting. Notice how the jury foreman sounds almost...what...afraid? His hands were visibly shaking as he read out the verdict. That is the first time I've ever seen a jury so reluctant, so hesitant to return a guilty verdict. And I've observed a few in my day. I'm not going to say the jury was coerced (yet, anyway). That's a whole other story and website. But I'll say, they didn't hide it very well. Then, in the afternoon, we have Myhre requesting the court order a psychiatric assessment and actually trying to suggest he believes Patrick may be delusional! Can you believe that? Myhre! Read his emails to Patrick, right here on this site, and tell me which one you think is delusional. Myhre's the one insisting Patrick was born in Ontario - even though all the evidence, and even IRCC, say he was not born in Canada! To this day, Myhre still insists Patrick is a Canadian citizen! Myhre, you need help, man. You need many hours on the psychiatrist's couch.

RCMP Reports to Crown Counsel

Date	Description	Comments
2016-09-07	RTCC v1	It is truly amazing how the RCMP is able to stretch the truth and ignore any evidence that doesn't fit with their allegations. Even though they clearly knew Desiree was lying, they still make Patrick seem like a crazed serial killer.
2016-11-15	RTCC v2
2017-03-15	RTCC v3
2017-04-10	RTCC v4
2017-05-30	RTCC v5

RCMP Interviews

Date	Interviewed Party	Media	Comments
2015-07-19	Desiree Capuano go to page >>	transcript audio	Desiree's first complaint to the RCMP for criminal harassment. Notice the date is the same day Patrick first mentioned James Pendleton on this website. Coincidence?
2015-07-20	Patrick Fox go to page >>	transcript audio	Patrick's first arrest for criminal harassment. All the charges were later dropped.
2016-06-10	Desiree Capuano go to page >>	transcript audio	Not much interesting here. Just the usual Desiree bullshit of lying and pretending to cry and care about things other than herself and weed.
2016-06-16	Patrick Fox go to page >>	transcript audio	Nothing interesting here. Just some cop telling Patrick his rights and shit.
2016-06-16	Patrick Fox go to page >>	transcript audio	Nothing interesting here. Just some cop telling Patrick his rights and shit. Same as above.
2016-06-16	Patrick Fox go to page >>	transcript video audio	This is Patrick's main interrogation following his arrest in 2016. Notice how calm and civil everything is. You know why? Because he didn't break any fucking laws, and he knew it! He even had to education the RCMP on their own fucking regulations regarding exporting his firearms. Of course, they disregarded what he was saying and charged him with unlawful exportation anyway (that charge was later dropped after Patrick also had to educate that fuckwad, Myhre, on the same issue). Fucking idiots!
2016-06-17	Desiree Capuano go to page >>	transcript video audio	Yet another interview by Desiree. Does she ever get tired of all the attention? This one was done via Skype. Mark Myhre (Crown Counsel) used this video in lieu of having Desiree testify at the preliminary inquiry (over Patrick's objections, of course). The lawyer Patrick had for the prelim (Clinton Bauman) was obviously a useless tool because he never even bothered to bring up the other interview where Desiree laugh about all this.
2016-06-17	Mohammed Khan go to page >>	transcript audio	Works at The Packaging Depot - where that jackoff, Myhre, insists Patrick shipped his firearms from.
2016-06-17	Manvir Mangat go to page >>	transcript audio	The owner of The Packaging Depot - where the Crown (Mark Myhre) claims Patrick shipped his firearms from.
2016-06-19	Mojgan Darabian	audio	The woman that moved into Patrick's old apartment after he moved out. The RCMP went there to seize Patrick's firearms, not realizing he had already moved out.
2016-07-11	Liz M. go to page >>	transcript audio	Patrick's good friend. The RCMP actually sent some stooges down to Los Angeles to interview her, hoping to get some information they could use against him. But, unfortunately, the truth and reality didn't fit with their allegations.
2016-07-13	Desiree Capuano go to page >>	transcript audio	This is the interview where Desiree laughs and jokes with the RCMP about all the same shit she pretended to cry about at the trial and in the news media. That's mostly from about an hour in, through to the end. You will also notice how quickly and easily Desiree shifts from crying to laughing and back to crying, then laughing again. Gee, almost like she's faking the whole thing, right? Desiree also admits in here that she's been using {G*****}'s visitation and contact with Patrick to try to control Patrick. And, she admits that she only got the Arizona order of protection because she thought it was required to get the website taken down - not because she had any fear for her safety. And yes, the RCMP actually sent a couple of constables (or whatever they call them there) to Arizona to interview Desiree in person. They sure did put a lot of effort into trying to find something to use against Patrick. And for what? A website? This whole thing smells a little fishy.
2016-07-13	James Pendleton go to page >>	transcript audio	Pendleton's RCMP interview. In here he states that he will not allow any further contact or communication between Patrick and {G***}. In fact, the last time Patrick has had any contact with his son ({G***}) was on May 26, 2016 - the day before he was arrested. You will also notice, if you listen to the audio of this interview, that James Pendleton is one hell of a little panzy bitch. I mean, oh my God, if anyone appears to be scared of something it's him, not Desiree...and from what? Patrick? Patrick's never harmed a single person in his life (except in self-defense, of course).

Emails Between US CBP, US ICE, CBSA and RCMP

Date	Participants	Comments
2016-06-08	Denise Kam (RCMP), Kip West (CBP), Jose Arroyo (ICE), San-Marie Pereira (CBSA), John Bush (CBP), Christopher Stone (CBSA)	In this thread, ICE Deportation Officer Jose Arroyo admits that they know Patrick does not have a Canadian birth certificate or passport and that all they can do is take him to the border and "hope" Canada will accept him (page 2). Arroyo also points out that if Patrick is a "subject of interest" to the Canadian authorities that "would be the way to go" - in other words, convince the RCMP Patrick was intending to go to Arizona and harm Desiree, so that they will want to question him on it, thereby bypassing the deportation or extradition process.
2016-06-13	Jose Arroyo (ICE), Shan-Marie Pereira (CBSA), Kip West (CBP), Denise Kam (RCMP), John Bush (CBP), Christopher Stone (CBSA)
2016-06-16	Shan-Marie Pereira (CBSA), Denise Kam (RCMP), Frank Grosspietsch (RCMP), Simon Li (RCMP)	In this email thread, Corporal Grosspietsch of the RCMP admits they know Patrick is not a Canadian citizen (page 2). The statement "If he is allowed to enter..." shows that the RCMP was aware Patrick might not be permitted to enter Canada - Canadian citizens are always permitted to enter! Grosspietsch's statements also show that the RCMP's only real concern was finding out where Patrick's Canadian firearms were - not criminal harassment or this website.
2016-06-16	Robert Berg (ICE), Clifford Leyba (CBP), Denise Kam (RCMP), John Pokorski (CBP), Kip West (CBP), Jose Arroyo (ICE), Shan-Marie Pereira (CBSA), Christopher Stone (CBP), John Bush (CBP)	In this thread, RCMP Officer Denise Kam admits they have no evidence or reason to seize Patrick's firearms or his firearms license - even after reviewing the website (page 5).

Other Shit

Date	Description	Comments
2017-09-11	Victim Impact Statement	This is the complete, 8 page version of Desiree's Victim Impact Statement, as provided to Crown Counsel. The version that was accepted by the court was just the last few pages. In here, Desiree openly admits she never really believed Patrick would go to Arizona.
2017-11-10	Probation Order	Patrick's probation order. Three years! This prohibits him from leaving British Columbia, Canada, even though he has no status in Canada, is not allowed to work, and is not eligible for any government assistance. It also prohibits him from using the Internet.
2019-01-25	Psychiatric Assessment	Audio recording of Patrick's court ordered psychiatric assessment. Crown Counsel, Mark Myhre, pushed for this so that they could get a diagnosis of some mental disorder so they could discredit Patrick before he goes public with all his claims of collusion, prosecutorial misconduct, and all that shit. Looks like that plan backfired on ol' Myhre - that jackass. Where this really gets interesting is about an hour and ten minutes in.
2019-01-29	Patrick's Affidavit in Support of His Claims of Collusion Against Lagemaat and Myhre (submitted in his appeal)	This affidavit thoroughly details 81 distinct instances of perjury committed by Desiree at the trial, which defense counsel, Tony Lagemaat, and Crown Counsel, Mark Myhre, knew of while she was testifying, but they both refused to either confront her, cross examine her on it, or to inform the court or the jury that she was lying. The affidavit also states exactly where the proof that she was lying was and that Lagemaat and Myhre knew of that proof.
2019-02-18	Conversation with IRCC	Recording of a telephone conversation between Patrick and IRCC. IRCC openly states they acknowledge Patrick has no status in Canada, is not a Canadian citizen, and is in the country illegally. But still, they suggest he apply for a permanent resident status! The long periods on hold were removed for your convenience.
2019-02-19	Social Services Denial	The formal denial of Patrick's application for social assistance (welfare), based on him not having any legal citizenship or immigration status in Canada. In this report, they come right out and state "You are not a Canadian citizen".
2019-03-06	Conversation with CBSA	Recording of a telephone conversation between Patrick and CBSA. CBSA openly states Patrick has no status in Canada, and is not a Canadian citizen.

Mark Myhre

Crown Counsel (prosecutor)
BC Prosecution Service

Mark Myhre was the prosecutor for the trial and sentencing. He's also the prosecutor for the probation hearings every time Patrick tries to get the ridiculous prohibition on leaving BC removed. That monotonous, dry, flat voice you hear in all those recordings of the court proceedings - the one that's like vocal Prozac - that's Myhre.

Mark Myhre is such a horrible, disgusting, unscrupulous, ass licker of a motherucker that it is only befitting we devote an entire page on this website to chronicalling all the wonderful bullshit he did during the case and articulating our completely reasonable and rational opinions of him.

◀ More About Mark Myhre ▶
Tony Lagemaat

Defense Counsel (appointed to cross examine Capuano)
Lagemaat Law

Tony Lagemaat was appointed by the Court, against Patrick's objections, to perform the cross examination of Desiree, rather than Patrick being able to cross examine her himself.

Right from the outset, Lagemaat was colluding with Myhre to ensure that most of the evidence would not be presented; that Desiree would not be confronted with proof she was lying; that the audio recording of Desiree's July 13, 2016 RCMP interview would not be played for the court or the jury; and that none of the emails where Desiree threatened, harassed, belittled, and insulted Patrick prior to the creation of this website would be presented.

You might think this sounds too outrageous, there's no way such gross misconduct occurs in your (Canada's) justice system. Well, listen to the fucking audio recordings of Lagemaat and Myhre from the trial (linked below) - they're on this fucking website, for Christ's sake! Read the transcripts - also on this website (again, linked below)!

Either Lagemaat is the absolute most incompetent attorney in Vancouver (which he isn't - that would be David Hopkins); or, he was actively cooperating with the Crown as described above.

In the recording, below, you can hear Lagemaat pathetically trying to defend his decision NOT to play the recording of Desiree's July 2016 RCMP interview (at 24:50), where she's laughing and joking with the RCMP. And, at 25:50, you can hear Myhre conceding "it seems to me that most of that is not irrelevant". Right there! All the collusion, the secret agreement between Lagemaat and Myhre, for Lagemaat to make sure that recording doesn't get played - right out the fucking window! You see, all you people who might enter into an agreement with Mark Myhre, when push comes to shove he's going to throw you right over the bridge (or under the bus, or whatever the fuck the saying is). Way to go, Myhre - well hey, better Lagemaat's law career get trashed than your's, right? Ya selfish bastard!

Recording of discussion in court about Lagemaat choosing not to play the recording of Desiree's July 2016 RCMP interview.
Justice Heather Holmes

Trial/Sentencing Judge
BC Ministry of Justice

Prior to the trial, and during the trial, we didn't notice anything concerning about Justice Holmes. In fact, she seemed to be very fair and reasonable. That is, except on any matters relating to suggestions of impropriety in the justice system or it's participants. She steadfastly refused to acknowledge or accept any evidence from Patrick which would prove, or even suggest ANY hint of impropriety.

Patrick's Sentencing

Now, the sentencing, that's a whole other story. Patrick brought, literally, stacks of evidence - emails from Desiree, police reports, audio recordings - which proved Desiree had lied and that SHE had been subjecting him to harassment, threats, intimidation, for years prior to the creation of this website. Yet Justice Holmes completely disregarded every single piece of that evidence, as though it never existed. She sentenced Patrick to 3 years and 10 months in prison, followed by 3 years of probation with conditions that he not leave British Columbia (Canada), not go within 100 meters of the US border, and not use the Internet. Justice Holmes did not care that Patrick is not a Canadian citizen who is in Canada illegally and cannot work (legally) in Canada. Patrick pointed out that those conditions will, literally, require him to remain homeless and destitute for 3 years. Holmes didn't give a shit.

Patrick's Probation Variance Hearings

And, since his release from custody on December 30, 2018, Patrick has repeatedly appeared before Holmes seeking to have the restriction on leaving BC removed. Holmes has consistently ruled that Patrick has failed to establish he is not a Canadian citizen. At the most recent hearing, on March 14, 2019, Patrick submitted the recordings of the phone calls with IRCC and with CBSA , and the documents from the Ministry of Social Development , wherein all agencies clearly stated Patrick is not a Canadian citizen and does not have status in Canada. And you know what Holmes said? She said Patrick is manipulating those agencies, just like he's manipulating this court and the Crown. She said that Patrick manipulated IRCC and CBSA into saying what he wanted, then took that as them saying he doesn't have status. Really! Listen to the recordings yourself and decide for yourself. It would seem that Justice Holmes has quite an aversion to acknowledging that anything wrong was done in her justice system. It's just like the sentencing all over again.

Justice Holmes Praises Myhre

And get this, at the March 14 hearing, Holmes actually had the audacity to say that Myhre has carried himself exceptionally well throughout this case - even through some very challenging periods! What the fuck!?!? You mean like when he was conspiring with Lagemaat to make sure that recording of Desiree laughing with the RCMP doesn't get played? Wow!

And as if all that's not enough, Holmes actually chastised Patrick at the March 14 hearing because he hasn't put any effort into seeking employment or trying to obtain employment authorization from IRCC. Again, we say, What the Fuck?!?! Inadmissible! Do you know what that means, Miss Holmes? It means Patrick is barred from entering or being in Canada, in part due to having been convicted of criminal harassment! Inadmissible! IRCC does not issue employment permits to foreign nationals who are not allowed to enter Canada.

Justice Holmes Refuses to Order Crown to Request a DNA Sample

But wait, it doesn't end there! So, Desiree and Myhre claim to have been in contact with Steve Riess (Ricky Riess's father) and that Mr. Riess is willing and has offered to provide a DNA sample to prove he is Patrick's father. As you can see in the emails between Patrick and Myhre in the "Emails" section of this site, as soon as Patrick told Myhre "Yes, definitely do a DNA test so we can resolve that issue once and for all", Myhre quickly backed out of pursuing that. Anyway, at the March 14 hearing, Patrick requested the court order the Crown to request DNA samples from both Steve Riess and Peggy Sampogna (Ricky Riess's mother) - that would definitively prove whether or not Patrick is really Ricky Riess, and therefore, a Canadian citizen. Holmes flatly denied that request! It seems, like Myhre, Holmes does not want any definitive proof that Patrick and Ricky Riess are not the same person being presented. Heaven forbid we should prove incompetence, corruption, and misconduct in the justice system.
David Layton

Crown Counsel (prosecutor) (for the appeal)
BC Prosecution Service

David Layton was the prosecutor for the Crown at certain points of the appeal. In particular, after Patrick was arrested, detained, and denied bail in April 2019, Layton took over the appeal from Susanne Elliott. Obviously it would be an easy win for the Crown at that point. I mean, from within custody it is impossible for a defendant to litigate his appeal - Patrick had no access to legal resources, knew nothing about preparing a factum and, of course, had no access to financial resources to cover the cost ($2,125) of copies of the transcripts, et cetera.

Contrary to what some of the horrible Canadian news reported, Patrick's appeal was dismissed solely for failure to prosecute on Patrick's part. It was not dismissed based on the merits - the Court of Appeal never reached the point of considering the claims of ineffective assistance, collusion, or perjury.

Anyway, there's not much I can say about David Layton yet.
Natalie Clancy

Journalist - CBC (former)
Unifor National (labor union)

Natalie Clancy is the tabloid journalist who originally did the story on this website, Patrick, and Desiree. The story that started all the attention this website, Patrick, and of course, Desiree received.

Clancy's interview with Patrick was about an hour and a half. Most of what Patrick said was completely rational and he provided perfectly reasonable justifications for all of his actions. But from that hour and a half, Clancy and CBC took about 3 minutes of out of context statements, and did not bother to show the world ANY of Patrick's explanations for his conduct. No mention of how Desiree showed up, out of the blue, while Patrick was not present, and abducted their son {G*****} - who Patrick had custody of and had raised alone for 9 years - and ran off to Arizona with him; no mention of Desiree adamantly refusing to contribute a single thing to {G*****}'s well support or well being; no mention of Desiree repeatedly trying to get court orders prohibiting Patrick from having ANY contact with {G*****}. And all of that happened long before this website was created.

There was also no mention of the fact that after the first arrest for criminal harassment, the RCMP thoroughly investigated Patrick and this harassment claims to determine whether they should revoke Patrick's Canadian firearms license, and ultimately decided that No, there is absolutely no reason to revoke his firearms license. Clearly the RCMP realized there was absolutely no truth to Desiree's claims and no danger in Patrick owning firearms.

The whole time Patrick was in jail, he regularly provided Clancy (and Brend) updates and evidence to support his claims. Evidence that proved Desiree was lying and that he really isn't a Canadian citizen (and, therefore, didn't actually commit perjury in the US District Court). Clancy did not report a single word about any of that evidence. She reported every unfounded claim and allegation the Crown made as though it was proven gospel - but not one word of the proof that those claims were false.

As far as we can see, Clancy epitomizes Canadian journalism. Patrick has been out of custody since December 30, 2018 and, since that time, has provided numerous news agencies copies of much of the proof that he was born in the US, is not a Canadian citizen, yet the Canadian government allowed the US to deport him here; he has provided them proof of the collusion between Lagemaat and Myhre; yet not one Canadian news agency has shown ANY interest in reporting any of that.

Shortly after Patrick's trial, when he made it clear to Clancy (and Brend) that he was going to appeal and that he was going to publish everything related to his case, Clancy left CBC, and journalism altogether. Interesting that she was a journalist for her entire career - more than 20 years - then she suddenly left journalism and moved from Vancouver to some place called Halifax. I doubt it had anything to do with her outrageous handling of Patrick's story, but I'd like to think it does.
Yvette Brend

Militant Feminist, Man-Hating Journalist
CBC News

Yvette Brend was Natalie Clancy's accomplice in reporting on Patrick and his case. When Clancy left CBC, Brend took over the story. Though, nothing changed in how it was being reported - she, and CBC, continued to only report the adverse claims the Crown was making, without mentioning ANY of Patrick's explanations or defenses. They reported that Patrick "shipped" his 4 registered, Canadian handguns to Los Angeles by "hiding" them inside a computer case; they didn't report that Patrick told Brend he never shipped them - he brought them down to LA himself and only put them in the computer case so he wouldn't have to declare them to Customs and risk losing the more than $4,000 he had spent on them.

Since Patrick's release in late December 2018, he has provided Brend extensive evidence to support his claims, including documents from IRCC, emails between himself and Myhre, the recording of his psych assessment, but do you think Brend and CBC will ever report any of that? Don't hold your breath! If it doesn't have to do with allegations of a man bullying a woman it's not likely to be reported in Canadian news.

Apparently, Miss Brend has been dealing with some challenges in her personal life, related to her husband and PTSD. Perhaps we should cut her some slack...or perhaps we should show her the same amount of compassion, understanding and fairness she showed Patrick when she reported on him!
Laura Kane

Feminist, Journalist
The Canadian Press

Ah, Laura Kane! Interviewed Patrick for an hour over the phone; listened to his side of the story; then completely ignored everything he said and reported the entire story from Desiree's perspective. Canadian journalism!

Miss Kane also covered much of the trial. Though, just like with Clancy, Brend, and most of the other Canadian news media, she seemed to focus only on the Crown's allegations. Not one mention of the recordings of Desiree laughing about punching herself in the stomach to try to force a miscarriage with {G*****}, or about Desiree admitting that she had, in fact, been a stripper - after she vehemently denied that in the earlier news media, or about her admitting that she does have a drug problem - again, after vehemently denying that in her earlier news interviews.

Good job, Miss Kane! Your parents must be so proud of what you've become.
David Georgetti

Desiree's Lawyer (in her civil suit)
Vertlieb & Co.

David Georgetti is the tool that was hired by "unnamed sources" to file the civil suit against Patrick. The purpose of the civil suit was to get a temporary injunction against Patrick, forcing him to take down this website. Lotta good it did, huh? Money well spent (that's sarcasm, in case you didn't catch it).

Georgetti is your typical hack attorney. He seems to think he accomplished something by having a hearing for a temporary injunction against a guy who was in jail and had no access to any legal resources to prepare any kind of response.

Officially, according to Georgetti, he was hired by Desiree, but I think we all know that's a load of shit. Desiree has never wanted this website taken down because she loves all the attention it gets her. Why do you think all the complaints she filed with hosting and service providers were always with the wrong providers? So who was REALLY being harmed by this website and who REALLY wanted it to go away? CBC, Clancy, Brend, Kane, the RCMP, and the Crown! The news media because Patrick publicly called them out on their bullshit and refused to back down/take down the website; and the RCMP and Crown because of the bad publicity they got from the news media by not prosecuting Patrick in the first place.

So, Georgetti, who is a close (intimate?) friend of Myhre, was recruited by those affected parties when they realized that the criminal conviction was not going to make Patrick take down this site. Has Georgetti succeeded? Well, the fact that you're seeing this means he absolutely DID NOT - because he's a loser, he is incapable of accomplishing that task. And even if Patrick goes back to jail, this website will remain exactly where it is. So Georgetti and his backers can kiss my ass, or suck my cock, or whatever the fuck they're into (but I mean that in the most polite way).
Jason Potts

Interrogating Officer
Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Jason Potts is the RCMP officer who interrogated Patrick in June 2016. A copy of that entire interrogation is on this website (audio, video, transcript).

I'd like to say that Potts seems like a nice guy, but all of the RCMP officers seem nice when they're trying to get information from you. Mostly, like Constable Dupont, Potts was overwhelmingly forgettable - just a whole lot of don't-give-a-shit.
Jean-Philippe Dupont

Investigating Officer
Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Constable Dupont was involved with the original criminal harassment investigation - the one that was dropped. He seemed like a nice guy during the arrest and all that shit, but later turned into one of those spiteful feminists (I think they're called "white knights") that seems to be taking over Canada.

Not much more can be said about Dupont - he's not a very memorable character.
Heather Montagliani

Officer who read Patrick his rights
Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Constable Heather Montagliani had nothing to do with the case other than reading Patrick his rights after he was arrested. So why does she get the honor of appearing on this website? Well, she's smokin' hot. That's about it. There aren't enough attractive people on this website so we needed to balance it out a bit. There really should be more attractive people in the world.
Brent Wilcott

Detective
Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Corporal Brett Wilcott is the RCMP agent who went down to Los Angeles to interview Liz, and to Tucson to interview Desiree. He's the one you hear laughing with Desiree about her getting Patrick deported, and punching herself in the stomach.

Never met the guy. Maybe he's a nice guy, I don't know. Sure wish we had a photo of him to put up here. Maybe he'll contribute one.
Keith Fraser

Journalist
Post Media

Of all of the journalists who covered the trial and sentencing, it is my opinion that Keith Fraser was the most objective and fair.

But even still, as with all Canadian media, he seems to be reluctant to tell the whole story. It's probably PostMedia, not Mr. Fraser, that only wants to report what sells.
Clinton Bauman

Defense Lawyer (for the preliminary inquiry)
"Self-employed" (whatever that means for a lawyer)
Talia Magder

Defense Lawyer (for the 684 application)
TM Law

Talia Magder was appointed to assist Patrick with the preparation of his section 684 application. As is typical with questionable lawyers who are cooperating with the Crown, Magder waited until a couple days before the hearing to provide Patrick a copy of her memorandum.

Even though Patrick was claiming that both Lagemaat and Myhre colluded to suppress critical evidence and offer perjured testimony, at the 684 hearing, and in her brief, Magder made absolutely no mention of Myhre's involvement. At the hearing, Patrick pointedly brought up that fact and mentioned that is exactly the kind of stuff he is concerned any appointed lawyer will do. That was why Patrick was only seeking a partial appointment - for a lawyer who will assist him, but will not have discretion over which issues to raise. Magder's defense was that she believed Myhre's involvement was implied, so it wasn't necessary to explicitly mention him. Patrick pointed out that ineffective assistance and prosecutorial misconduct are two entirely different allegations.

At the 684 hearing, one of Patrick's goals was to get Magder to either state, on the record, that she did not believe Patrick's claims of collusion and complicity in Capuano's perjury had any merit - then he would publish the proof (which Magder had reviewed) and prove, publicly, that she sabotaged her client's case; or get her to admit, on the record, that she did believe Patrick's claims had merit. When Patrick pressed her on the issue, in court, she was very evasive and wouldn't give a straight answer. But when the judge asked her, she begrudgingly admitted that based on what she's seen Patrick's claims do appear to have merit.

Would we recommend using Magder to represent you in any legal matters? Yes, but only if you want to lose.
David Hopkins

Defense Lawyer (for the first bail hearing)
Hopkins Law

Ah, Jesus Christ, don't even get me started on David Hopkins! Holy fucker of mothers, what a useless tool he was. Read the section above dealing with Patrick's first bail hearing, where Hopkins represented him.

I mean, holy fuck! Refusing to simply go to the RCMP's website to verify that Patrick was well within the law by bringing his firearms to the US! And a couple days after the bail hearing, when Patrick was talking to fuckwad on the phone and Patrick says "Are you at a computer right now?" Hopkins says "Yes". Patrick says "Google rcmp firearms export. The second link that comes up is to the RCMP's website. Click that." Hopkins does. Patrick says "You see the link about needing an export permit (the second list item)? Read that!" Hopkins does so: "If the firearm is being exported to the United States, individuals only need an export permit if the firearm is prohibited." He puases, then says "Hmm." Hmm my motherfucking ass! Patrick tells him "You're fucking useless! You're services are no longer required. You're fired!" Bravo, Mr. Fox, Bravo!

Had Hopkins, that useless bastard, brought this up at the bail hearing then Patrick most certainly would have been granted bail. You don't, generally, get denied bail for criminal harassment on a first offense. Ah, that fucking Hopkins!

And would we recommend using Hopkins to represent you? Are you fucking nuts? Did you not read any of the above? You'll get better representation from a tree stump.
Susanne Elliott

Crown Counsel (prosecutor) (for the appeal)
BC Prosecution Service

Don't really have anything critical, witty, or interesting to say about Susanne Elliott. She's not that typical overly arrogant, self-righteous, asshole like most prosecutors are. Perhaps one day we'll discover otherwise, but up 'till now she's performed her role professionally and with dignity. Props to you, Miss Elliott.